G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Why buy it

✅53.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌175% higher power demand at 220W vs 80W.

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

2019

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 80W instead of 220W, a 140W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

2019

Why buy it

✅53.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 80W instead of 220W, a 140W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌175% higher power demand at 220W vs 80W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3070 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 53.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 82.1% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2020 instead of 2019, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2019, 82.1% more raw performance headroom, the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, and a 8nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3070 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $499 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 53.2% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 82.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3070 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3070 Benchmark Check

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	158 FPS	127 FPS
medium	140 FPS	109 FPS
high	123 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	62 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	103 FPS
medium	109 FPS	85 FPS
high	96 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	45 FPS
4K
low	80 FPS	45 FPS
medium	67 FPS	39 FPS
high	52 FPS	28 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	23 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	470 FPS	174 FPS
medium	405 FPS	139 FPS
high	327 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	294 FPS	134 FPS
medium	246 FPS	105 FPS
high	213 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	74 FPS
4K
low	141 FPS	78 FPS
medium	120 FPS	63 FPS
high	105 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	40 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	885 FPS	548 FPS
medium	712 FPS	438 FPS
high	619 FPS	365 FPS
ultra	499 FPS	274 FPS
1440p
low	692 FPS	411 FPS
medium	557 FPS	329 FPS
high	473 FPS	274 FPS
ultra	374 FPS	205 FPS
4K
low	479 FPS	274 FPS
medium	388 FPS	219 FPS
high	330 FPS	183 FPS
ultra	249 FPS	137 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	600 FPS	247 FPS
medium	527 FPS	214 FPS
high	433 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	145 FPS
1440p
low	489 FPS	189 FPS
medium	433 FPS	167 FPS
high	339 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	297 FPS	108 FPS
4K
low	292 FPS	112 FPS
medium	270 FPS	94 FPS
high	238 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	200 FPS	58 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3070

The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,173 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design's 12,173 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 82.1%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 7.066 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1380 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 40 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) with 184 Tensor cores vs 320.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score	22,172+82%	12,173
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Process Node	8 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	5888+130%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	20.31 TFLOPS+187%	7.066 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1725 MHz+25%	1380 MHz
ROPs	96+50%	64
TMUs	184+15%	160
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+132%	2.5 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	46+15%	40
Tensor Cores	184	320+74%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 93.3% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
TDP	220W	80W-64%
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	0mm
Height	112mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	100.8	152.2+51%