
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Quadro T2000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+218.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 219.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 13.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌266.7% higher power demand at 220W vs 60W.
Quadro T2000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 220W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,959 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌0.2% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Quadro T2000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅+218.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 219.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 13.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 220W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌266.7% higher power demand at 220W vs 60W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,959 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌0.2% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Quadro T2000 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro T2000 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 56 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 289 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 52 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Quadro T2000 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro T2000 (móvel)
Quadro T2000 (móvel)
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1575 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Quadro T2000 (móvel)'s 6,959 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 218.6%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro T2000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1,024 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1785 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+219% | 6,959 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+475% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+456% | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1785 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 184+188% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+480% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T2000 (móvel) has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1 MB (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro T2000 (móvel)'s 60W — a 114.3% difference. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 60W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 116.0+15% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Quadro T2000 (móvel) launched at $500. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 0.2% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 13.9 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 219.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+219% | 13.9 |
| Codename | GA104 | TU117 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #63 | #319 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












