
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+75% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌22.2% higher power demand at 220W vs 180W.
Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 220W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,669 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅+75% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 220W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌22.2% higher power demand at 220W vs 180W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,669 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Radeon RX 5700M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 5700M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 40 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 456 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 278 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 123 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon RX 5700M

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon RX 5700M
Radeon RX 5700M
The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 12,669 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 75%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 5700M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 7.926 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700M). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+75% | 12,669 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+156% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+156% | 7.926 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1720 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+28% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5700M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700M) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 5700M) — the Radeon RX 5700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+17% | 384 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 180W — a 20% difference. The Radeon RX 5700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5700M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 180W-18% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+43% | 70.4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












