GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Intel Arc Pro B60
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Popular choices:
Intel Arc Pro B60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro B60
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Arc Pro B60.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and Intel Arc Pro B60
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,332 points.
Intel Arc Pro B60
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,807 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile scores 14,332 and the Intel Arc Pro B60 reaches 13,807 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Intel Arc Pro B60 uses Xe2, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 2,560 (Intel Arc Pro B60). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B60). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 20 (Intel Arc Pro B60) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,332+4% | 13,807 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS+37% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2400 MHz+37% |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80 | 160+100% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+200% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Intel Arc Pro B60 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel Arc Pro B60 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B60) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+200% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (Intel Arc Pro B60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) (Intel Arc Pro B60). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Xe Media Engine (Battlemage). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Intel Arc Pro B60).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile draws 50W versus the Intel Arc Pro B60's 200W — a 120% difference. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B60). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 82.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-75% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-2% | 82 |
| Perf/Watt | 286.6+315% | 69.0 |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $450 |
| Codename | AD107 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | September 5 2025 |
| Ranking | #166 | #175 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and Intel Arc Pro B60
