GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Quadro RTX 4000

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

2023Core: 1455 MHzBoost: 1755 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 4000

2018Core: 1005 MHzBoost: 1545 MHz

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Quadro RTX 4000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Quadro RTX 4000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Quadro RTX 4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $599 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
  • Delivers 187.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 288), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

Quadro RTX 4000

2018

Why buy it

  • 5.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 260% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (288 vs 80).

Trade-offs

  • GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • 199.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $899 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro RTX 4000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4.1% in PassMark G3D (14,925 vs 14,332), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 12nm and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile makes the most sense to buy today. It is $599 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $899, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 187.8% (47.8 vs 16.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro RTX 4000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Quadro RTX 4000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,332 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 4000

The Quadro RTX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1005 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,925 points. Launch price was $899.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile scores 14,332 and the Quadro RTX 4000 reaches 14,925 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 4000 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 2,304 (Quadro RTX 4000). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1545 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 36 (Quadro RTX 4000) with 80 Tensor cores vs 288.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4050 MobileQuadro RTX 4000
G3D Mark Score
14,332
14,925+4%
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Turing
Process Node
5 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2560+11%
2304
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.986 TFLOPS+26%
7.119 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1755 MHz+14%
1545 MHz
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
80
144+80%
L1 Cache
2.5 MB+9%
2.3 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB+200%
4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
20
36+80%
Tensor Cores
80
288+260%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both cards support Frame Generation in supported games, so this part of the feature set is broadly comparable.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4050 MobileQuadro RTX 4000
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 4000) — a 133.3% advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000. L2 Cache: 12 MB (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4050 MobileQuadro RTX 4000
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
448 GB/s+133%
Bus Width
96-bit
256-bit+167%
L2 Cache
12 MB+200%
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4050 MobileQuadro RTX 4000
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 4000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4050 MobileQuadro RTX 4000
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC
NVENC 7.0
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
PureVideo HD VP10
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile draws 50W versus the Quadro RTX 4000's 160W — a 104.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4050 MobileQuadro RTX 4000
TDP
50W-69%
160W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
241mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
286.6+207%
93.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile came in at $300, while the Quadro RTX 4000 launched at $899. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile was 66.6% cheaper ($599 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 16.6 (Quadro RTX 4000) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile offers 188% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (2023 vs 2018).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4050 MobileQuadro RTX 4000
MSRP
$300-67%
$899
Performance per Dollar
47.8+188%
16.6
Codename
AD107
TU104
Release
January 3 2023
November 13 2018
Ranking
#166
#154

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.