
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Quadro RTX 4000
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Quadro RTX 4000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Quadro RTX 4000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Quadro RTX 4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $599 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 187.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 288), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quadro RTX 4000
2018Why buy it
- ✅5.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅260% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (288 vs 80).
Trade-offs
- ❌GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌199.7% HIGHER MSRP$899 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Quadro RTX 4000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,332 points.

Quadro RTX 4000
The Quadro RTX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1005 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,925 points. Launch price was $899.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile scores 14,332 and the Quadro RTX 4000 reaches 14,925 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 4000 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 2,304 (Quadro RTX 4000). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1545 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 36 (Quadro RTX 4000) with 80 Tensor cores vs 288.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,332 | 14,925+4% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+26% | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+14% | 1545 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 80 | 144+80% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+9% | 2.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+200% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 36+80% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 288+260% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation in supported games, so this part of the feature set is broadly comparable.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 4000) — a 133.3% advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000. L2 Cache: 12 MB (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 448 GB/s+133% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+200% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 4000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile draws 50W versus the Quadro RTX 4000's 160W — a 104.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-69% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 286.6+207% | 93.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile came in at $300, while the Quadro RTX 4000 launched at $899. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile was 66.6% cheaper ($599 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 16.6 (Quadro RTX 4000) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile offers 188% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-67% | $899 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+188% | 16.6 |
| Codename | AD107 | TU104 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | November 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #166 | #154 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















