GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6600 LE

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

2023Core: 1455 MHzBoost: 1755 MHz
RTX family
·····
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6600 LE

2023Core: 1626 MHzBoost: 2495 MHz
RX family
·······

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6600 LE Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6600 LE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6600 LE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $29 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
  • Delivers 14.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 41.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 132W, a 82W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6600 LE across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Radeon RX 6600 LE

2023

Why buy it

  • 5.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 9.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $329 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 41.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 164% higher power demand at 132W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX 6600 LE is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile instead at 14,332 vs 13,758, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 7nm. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile makes the most sense to buy today. It is $29 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $329, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 14.2% (47.8 vs 41.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon RX 6600 LE still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6600 LE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,332 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 6600 LE

The Radeon RX 6600 LE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 8 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,758 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile scores 14,332 and the Radeon RX 6600 LE reaches 13,758 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6600 LE uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 8.942 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 28 (Radeon RX 6600 LE) with 80 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4050 MobileRadeon RX 6600 LE
G3D Mark Score
14,332+4%
13,758
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
5 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
2560+43%
1792
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.986 TFLOPS
8.942 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1755 MHz
2495 MHz+42%
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
80
112+40%
L1 Cache
2.5 MB+400%
0.5 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB+500%
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
20
28+40%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both GPUs support Frame Generation, but they get there through different ecosystems. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6600 LE relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can help smooth out supported games, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6600 LE leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4050 MobileRadeon RX 6600 LE
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
FSR 3
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6600 LE) — a 16.7% advantage for the Radeon RX 6600 LE. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 6600 LE. L2 Cache: 12 MB (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600 LE) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4050 MobileRadeon RX 6600 LE
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
224 GB/s+17%
Bus Width
96-bit
128-bit+33%
L2 Cache
12 MB+500%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4050 MobileRadeon RX 6600 LE
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.3
1.4+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6600 LE).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4050 MobileRadeon RX 6600 LE
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC
VCN 3.0
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
VCN 3.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 6600 LE's 132W — a 90.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 450W (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 190mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4050 MobileRadeon RX 6600 LE
TDP
50W-62%
132W
Recommended PSU
500W
450W-10%
Power Connector
Mobile
8-pin
Length
0mm
190mm
Height
0mm
110mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
286.6+175%
104.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile came in at $300, while the Radeon RX 6600 LE launched at $329. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile was 8.8% cheaper ($29 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 41.8 (Radeon RX 6600 LE) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile offers 14.4% better value.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4050 MobileRadeon RX 6600 LE
MSRP
$300-9%
$329
Performance per Dollar
47.8+14%
41.8
Codename
AD107
Navi 23
Release
January 3 2023
December 8 2023
Ranking
#166
#176

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.