G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+163.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 558.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌80.4% higher power demand at 285W vs 158W.

Radeon PRO V710

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 158W instead of 285W, a 127W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,000 vs 31,578).
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
150.3% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Radeon PRO V710

2024

Why buy it

✅+163.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 558.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Why buy it

✅Draws 158W instead of 285W, a 127W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌80.4% higher power demand at 285W vs 158W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,000 vs 31,578).
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
150.3% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon PRO V710?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 31,578 vs 12,000 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon PRO V710 is a 2024 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 163.2% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 8 GB, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 4nm process instead of 5nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is about $1,201 cheaper on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $2,000 MSRP, and you are getting 163.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 558.7%. Radeon PRO V710 is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (158W vs 285W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon PRO V710 make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti?

Yes. Radeon PRO V710 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (158W vs 285W), and staying closer to $2,000 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 4070 Ti currently gives you 163.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 558.7%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO V710 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO V710
1080p
low	188 FPS	215 FPS
medium	171 FPS	196 FPS
high	155 FPS	170 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	130 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	180 FPS
medium	125 FPS	146 FPS
high	111 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	102 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	96 FPS
medium	79 FPS	81 FPS
high	66 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	56 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO V710

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO V710
1080p
low	664 FPS	509 FPS
medium	539 FPS	414 FPS
high	415 FPS	327 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	270 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	338 FPS
medium	400 FPS	269 FPS
high	329 FPS	221 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	185 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	157 FPS
medium	211 FPS	130 FPS
high	187 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	87 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO V710

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO V710
1080p
low	921 FPS	540 FPS
medium	742 FPS	432 FPS
high	652 FPS	360 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	270 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	405 FPS
medium	578 FPS	324 FPS
high	497 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	202 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	270 FPS
medium	403 FPS	216 FPS
high	352 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	135 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO V710

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO V710
1080p
low	879 FPS	540 FPS
medium	731 FPS	432 FPS
high	664 FPS	360 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	270 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	405 FPS
medium	585 FPS	324 FPS
high	514 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	202 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	270 FPS
medium	408 FPS	216 FPS
high	366 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	135 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO V710

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon PRO V710

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon PRO V710

The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon PRO V710's 12,000 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 163.2%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 54 (Radeon PRO V710) with 240 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO V710
G3D Mark Score	31,578+163%	12,000
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	4 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	7680+122%	3456
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS+45%	27.65 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2610 MHz+31%	2000 MHz
ROPs	80	96+20%
TMUs	240+11%	216
L1 Cache	7.5 MB+900%	0.75 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+2300%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	60+11%	54

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO V710 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO V710 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO V710
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO V710 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO V710) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO V710
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+50%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	48 MB+2300%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO V710
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO V710
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon PRO V710's 158W — a 57.3% difference. The Radeon PRO V710 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO V710
TDP	285W	158W-45%
Recommended PSU	700W	500W-29%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	285mm	267mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	110.8+46%	75.9

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO V710 launched at $2000. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 60.1% less ($1201 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 558.3% better value. The Radeon PRO V710 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).