
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅41.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 133.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌307.1% higher power demand at 285W vs 70W.
- ❌70.7% longer card at 285mm vs 167mm.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 285W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 285mm, a 118mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌6.3% HIGHER MSRP$849 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($849 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅41.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 133.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 285W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 285mm, a 118mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌307.1% higher power demand at 285W vs 70W.
- ❌70.7% longer card at 285mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌6.3% HIGHER MSRP$849 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($849 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 431 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 323 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 162 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 76 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 14,363 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 119.9%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1957 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 34 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) with 240 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+120% | 14,363 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+76% | 4352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+135% | 17.03 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+33% | 1957 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+76% | 136 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+74% | 4.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+50% | 32 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+76% | 34 |
| Tensor Cores | 240+76% | 136 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has 16 GB. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+50% | 32 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 70W — a 121.1% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 70W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 500W-29% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | 167mm |
| Height | 112mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8 | 205.2+85% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell launched at $849. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 5.9% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 16.9 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 133.7% better value. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-6% | $849 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5+134% | 16.9 |
| Codename | AD104 | GB206 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #11 | #165 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












