
GeForce RTX 4070

GeForce RTX 5070
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce RTX 5070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce RTX 5070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce RTX 5070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 192), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌9.1% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.9 vs 52.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌24.1% longer card at 304mm vs 245mm.
GeForce RTX 5070
2025Why buy it
- ✅10.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 17% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.6 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅4.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (192 vs 184).
- ✅Measures 245mm instead of 304mm, a 59mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce RTX 5070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce RTX 5070
The GeForce RTX 5070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 4 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2325 MHz to 2512 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,854 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the GeForce RTX 5070's 28,854 — the GeForce RTX 5070 leads by 7.2%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 5070 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 6,144 (GeForce RTX 5070). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 30.87 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5070). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2512 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 48 (GeForce RTX 5070) with 184 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919 | 28,854+7% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 6144+4% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS | 30.87 TFLOPS+6% |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz | 2512 MHz+1% |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 184 | 192+4% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 6 MB+3% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB | 48 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 48+4% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 192+4% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the GeForce RTX 5070 is on the newer stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the GeForce RTX 4070 stays on DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The GeForce RTX 5070 supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14% |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 4)+14% |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 12 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5070) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5070. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 5070. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 5070) — the GeForce RTX 5070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 672 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB | 48 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5070). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (6th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5070).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC (9th Gen) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (6th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the GeForce RTX 5070's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 5070). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 304mm vs 245mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 72°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 304mm | 245mm |
| Height | 137mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 72°C-10% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+17% | 115.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the GeForce RTX 5070 launched at $549. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 5070 was 8.3% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 52.6 (GeForce RTX 5070) — the GeForce RTX 5070 offers 17.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 5070 (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $549-8% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9 | 52.6+17% |
| Codename | AD104 | GB205 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | March 4 2025 |
| Ranking | #32 | #22 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














