GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce2 MX/MX 400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce2 MX/MX 400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce2 MX/MX 400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅19124.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 144831.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌700% higher power demand at 200W vs 25W.
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 200W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce2 MX/MX 400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the GeForce2 MX/MX 400's 4 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 672875%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 896 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1575 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+672875% | 4 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+557% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+804% | 3.226 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+57% | 1575 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 184+188% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX/MX 400.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+2300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 7.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+74% | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+283% | 1.2 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs None (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | None |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | MPEG-2 Decoder |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the GeForce2 MX/MX 400's 25W — a 155.6% difference. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 55°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 25W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | — |
| Height | 137mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 3 | 1-67% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 55°C-31% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+67200% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 launched at $129. On MSRP, GeForce2 MX/MX 400 was 78.5% cheaper ($470 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $129-78% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9 | 0.0 |
| Codename | AD104 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | August 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #32 | #523 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 and GeForce2 MX/MX 400
