G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce3 Ti 200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce3 Ti 200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅19124.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 167301.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 368), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌66.1% longer card at 304mm vs 183mm.

GeForce3 Ti 200

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅100% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (368 vs 184).
✅Measures 183mm instead of 304mm, a 121mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2018 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 19124.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 672875% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 4), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce3 Ti 200 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 12nm, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2018. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $450 more expensive on MSRP at $599 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 167301.1% (44.9 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce3 Ti 200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce3 Ti 200

The GeForce3 Ti 200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the GeForce3 Ti 200's 4 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 672875%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce3 Ti 200 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,944 (GeForce3 Ti 200). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 200). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1710 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 46 (GeForce3 Ti 200) with 184 Tensor cores vs 368.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GeForce3 Ti 200
G3D Mark Score	26,919+672875%	4
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Turing
Process Node	5 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	5888+100%	2944
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+189%	10.07 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+45%	1710 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	184	184
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+100%	2.9 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+800%	4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	46	46
Tensor Cores	184	368+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce3 Ti 200 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce3 Ti 200 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GeForce3 Ti 200
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce3 Ti 200 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 200. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4 MB (GeForce3 Ti 200) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GeForce3 Ti 200
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+2300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	36 MB+800%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GeForce3 Ti 200
DirectX	12.2+51%	8.1
Vulkan	1.3	N/A
OpenGL	4.6+254%	1.3
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs None (GeForce3 Ti 200). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce3 Ti 200).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GeForce3 Ti 200
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	None
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	None
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the GeForce3 Ti 200's 215W — a 7.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (GeForce3 Ti 200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 183mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 60.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GeForce3 Ti 200
TDP	200W-7%	215W
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	183mm
Height	137mm	100mm
Slots	3	1-67%
Temp (Load)	80°C	60-25%
Perf/Watt	134.6	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the GeForce3 Ti 200 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce3 Ti 200 was 75.1% cheaper ($450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.0 (GeForce3 Ti 200) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2018).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GeForce3 Ti 200
MSRP	$599	$149-75%
Performance per Dollar	44.9	0.0
Codename	AD104	TU104
Release	April 12 2023	September 20 2018
Ranking	#32	#94

Search GeForce RTX 4070 on Amazon

Search GeForce3 Ti 200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.