
GeForce RTX 4070

GeForce3 Ti 500
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce3 Ti 500 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce3 Ti 500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce3 Ti 500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅19124.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 522700.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 680), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌66.1% longer card at 304mm vs 183mm.
GeForce3 Ti 500
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅269.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (680 vs 184).
- ✅Measures 183mm instead of 304mm, a 121mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce3 Ti 500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce3 Ti 500
The GeForce3 Ti 500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the GeForce3 Ti 500's 3 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 897200%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce3 Ti 500 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 21,760 (GeForce3 Ti 500). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 500). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 170 (GeForce3 Ti 500) with 184 Tensor cores vs 680.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce3 Ti 500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+897200% | 3 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 21760+270% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS | 104.8 TFLOPS+260% |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+3% | 2407 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 176+175% |
| TMUs | 184 | 680+270% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 21.3 MB+267% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB | 96 MB+167% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 170+270% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 680+270% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce3 Ti 500 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce3 Ti 500 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce3 Ti 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce3 Ti 500 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 500. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 96 MB (GeForce3 Ti 500) — the GeForce3 Ti 500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce3 Ti 500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+2300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB | 96 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce3 Ti 500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+51% | 8.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+207% | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs None (GeForce3 Ti 500). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce3 Ti 500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce3 Ti 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | None |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | MPEG-2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the GeForce3 Ti 500's 575W — a 96.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (GeForce3 Ti 500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 183mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce3 Ti 500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-65% | 575W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 183mm |
| Height | 137mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 3 | 1-67% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the GeForce3 Ti 500 launched at $349. On MSRP, GeForce3 Ti 500 was 41.7% cheaper ($250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.0 (GeForce3 Ti 500) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce3 Ti 500 (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce3 Ti 500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $349-42% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9 | 0.0 |
| Codename | AD104 | GB202 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | January 30 2025 |
| Ranking | #32 | #3 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














