G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅+959.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 784.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌30300% longer card at 304mm vs 1mm.

GRID K240Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Measures 1mm instead of 304mm, a 303mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,541 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

GRID K240Q

2013

Why buy it

✅+959.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 784.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Measures 1mm instead of 304mm, a 303mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌30300% longer card at 304mm vs 1mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,541 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than GRID K240Q?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 2,541 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while GRID K240Q is a 2013 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2013, 959.4% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 2 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 4070 is about 19.8% more expensive on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 959.4% higher G3D Mark. GRID K240Q really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is GRID K240Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. GRID K240Q is 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 2,541 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

GRID K240Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	GRID K240Q
1080p
low	183 FPS	102 FPS
medium	167 FPS	83 FPS
high	151 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	38 FPS
1440p
low	150 FPS	85 FPS
medium	124 FPS	69 FPS
high	110 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	28 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	28 FPS
medium	78 FPS	26 FPS
high	65 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open GRID K240Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	GRID K240Q
1080p
low	544 FPS	88 FPS
medium	454 FPS	62 FPS
high	353 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	299 FPS	32 FPS
1440p
low	351 FPS	48 FPS
medium	288 FPS	31 FPS
high	235 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	17 FPS
4K
low	172 FPS	18 FPS
medium	144 FPS	12 FPS
high	125 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	7 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open GRID K240Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	GRID K240Q
1080p
low	884 FPS	114 FPS
medium	713 FPS	91 FPS
high	643 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	57 FPS
1440p
low	684 FPS	86 FPS
medium	549 FPS	69 FPS
high	483 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	43 FPS
4K
low	467 FPS	57 FPS
medium	373 FPS	46 FPS
high	326 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	29 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open GRID K240Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	GRID K240Q
1080p
low	751 FPS	114 FPS
medium	612 FPS	91 FPS
high	536 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	497 FPS	57 FPS
1440p
low	615 FPS	86 FPS
medium	500 FPS	69 FPS
high	433 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	395 FPS	43 FPS
4K
low	384 FPS	57 FPS
medium	324 FPS	46 FPS
high	301 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	29 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open GRID K240Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and GRID K240Q

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

GRID K240Q

The GRID K240Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,541 points. Launch price was $469.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the GRID K240Q's 2,541 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 959.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GRID K240Q uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1,536 (GRID K240Q). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K240Q).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GRID K240Q
G3D Mark Score	26,919+959%	2,541
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Kepler
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	5888+283%	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+1173%	2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	184+44%	128
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+4362%	0.13 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+7100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GRID K240Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID K240Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GRID K240Q
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K240Q has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K240Q) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GRID K240Q
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+500%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	36 MB+7100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 11_0 (GRID K240Q). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GRID K240Q
DirectX	12.2+11%	11_0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GRID K240Q).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GRID K240Q
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	—
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	—
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the GRID K240Q's 225W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (GRID K240Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 1mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GRID K240Q
TDP	200W-11%	225W
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	1mm
Height	137mm	—
Slots	3	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	134.6+1091%	11.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the GRID K240Q launched at $500. The GRID K240Q costs 16.5% less ($99 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 5.1 (GRID K240Q) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 780.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).