G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅+585.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,401 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2189.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

GRID P6-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,926 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
233.9% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$599 MSRP

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

GRID P6-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅+585.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,401 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2189.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,926 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
233.9% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$599 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than GRID P6-2Q?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 3,926 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while GRID P6-2Q is a 2015 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015, 585.7% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 2 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 is about $1,401 cheaper on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $2,000 MSRP, and you are getting 585.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 2189.3%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is GRID P6-2Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GRID P6-2Q is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $2,000 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

GRID P6-2Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	GRID P6-2Q
1080p
low	183 FPS	103 FPS
medium	167 FPS	85 FPS
high	151 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	40 FPS
1440p
low	150 FPS	86 FPS
medium	124 FPS	72 FPS
high	110 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	29 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	28 FPS
medium	78 FPS	26 FPS
high	65 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open GRID P6-2Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	GRID P6-2Q
1080p
low	544 FPS	128 FPS
medium	454 FPS	101 FPS
high	353 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	299 FPS	63 FPS
1440p
low	351 FPS	88 FPS
medium	288 FPS	65 FPS
high	235 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	40 FPS
4K
low	172 FPS	41 FPS
medium	144 FPS	32 FPS
high	125 FPS	29 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	24 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open GRID P6-2Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	GRID P6-2Q
1080p
low	884 FPS	177 FPS
medium	713 FPS	141 FPS
high	643 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	88 FPS
1440p
low	684 FPS	133 FPS
medium	549 FPS	106 FPS
high	483 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	66 FPS
4K
low	467 FPS	88 FPS
medium	373 FPS	71 FPS
high	326 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	44 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open GRID P6-2Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	GRID P6-2Q
1080p
low	751 FPS	177 FPS
medium	612 FPS	141 FPS
high	536 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	497 FPS	88 FPS
1440p
low	615 FPS	131 FPS
medium	500 FPS	106 FPS
high	433 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	395 FPS	66 FPS
4K
low	384 FPS	77 FPS
medium	324 FPS	60 FPS
high	301 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	36 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open GRID P6-2Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and GRID P6-2Q

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

GRID P6-2Q

The GRID P6-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,926 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the GRID P6-2Q's 3,926 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 585.7%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GRID P6-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,048 (GRID P6-2Q). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P6-2Q). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GRID P6-2Q
G3D Mark Score	26,919+586%	3,926
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	5888+188%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+504%	4.825 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+110%	1178 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	184+44%	128
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+673%	0.75 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+1700%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GRID P6-2Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID P6-2Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GRID P6-2Q
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P6-2Q has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2 MB (GRID P6-2Q) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GRID P6-2Q
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+500%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	36 MB+1700%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (12_1) (GRID P6-2Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GRID P6-2Q
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC 4 (GRID P6-2Q). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,H.265 (GRID P6-2Q).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GRID P6-2Q
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	NVENC 4
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC 3
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the GRID P6-2Q's 225W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (GRID P6-2Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GRID P6-2Q
TDP	200W-11%	225W
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	—
Height	137mm	—
Slots	3	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	134.6+674%	17.4

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the GRID P6-2Q launched at $2000. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 70% less ($1401 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2.0 (GRID P6-2Q) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 2145% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).