GeForce RTX 4070 vs Iris Plus Graphics 950

CPU

GPU

GeForce RTX 4070

2023Core: 1920 MHzBoost: 2475 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Iris Plus Graphics 950

Core: 400 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz

Popular choices:

••••••RTX 4070•••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce RTX 4070

12 GB 200

26,919

+1404.7%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI

GeForce RTX 5060

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 5070

GeForce RTX 4090 D

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Iris Plus Graphics 950

Shared System RAM 15

1,789

0.0%

Arc A530M

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅+1404.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌1233.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 15W.

Iris Plus Graphics 950

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 200W, a 185W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,789 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: older-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Iris Plus Graphics 950

Why buy it

✅+1404.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 200W, a 185W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌1233.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,789 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: older-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Iris Plus Graphics 950?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 1,789 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Iris Plus Graphics 950 is a 0 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 0, 1404.7% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of Unknown, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $599 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 1404.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Iris Plus Graphics 950 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Iris Plus Graphics 950 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still fine for 1080p, but 1440p and especially 4K require more compromise. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

Iris Plus Graphics 950 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Iris Plus Graphics 950
1080p
low	183 FPS	43 FPS
medium	167 FPS	30 FPS
high	151 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	10 FPS
1440p
low	150 FPS	34 FPS
medium	124 FPS	21 FPS
high	110 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	11 FPS
medium	78 FPS	7 FPS
high	65 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Iris Plus Graphics 950

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Iris Plus Graphics 950
1080p
low	544 FPS	76 FPS
medium	454 FPS	49 FPS
high	353 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	299 FPS	23 FPS
1440p
low	351 FPS	48 FPS
medium	288 FPS	26 FPS
high	235 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	14 FPS
4K
low	172 FPS	23 FPS
medium	144 FPS	14 FPS
high	125 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	8 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Iris Plus Graphics 950

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Iris Plus Graphics 950
1080p
low	884 FPS	81 FPS
medium	713 FPS	64 FPS
high	643 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	40 FPS
1440p
low	684 FPS	60 FPS
medium	549 FPS	48 FPS
high	483 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	30 FPS
4K
low	467 FPS	40 FPS
medium	373 FPS	32 FPS
high	326 FPS	27 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	20 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Iris Plus Graphics 950

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Iris Plus Graphics 950
1080p
low	751 FPS	81 FPS
medium	612 FPS	64 FPS
high	536 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	497 FPS	40 FPS
1440p
low	615 FPS	60 FPS
medium	500 FPS	48 FPS
high	433 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	395 FPS	30 FPS
4K
low	384 FPS	40 FPS
medium	324 FPS	32 FPS
high	301 FPS	27 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	20 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Iris Plus Graphics 950

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Iris Plus Graphics 950

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Iris Plus Graphics 950

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 1,789 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 1404.7%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 uses Generation 11.0, both on 5 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Iris Plus Graphics 950
G3D Mark Score	26,919+1405%	1,789
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Generation 11.0
Process Node	5 nm	10 nm
Shading Units	5888+1050%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+2747%	1.024 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+148%	1000 MHz
ROPs	64+700%	8
TMUs	184+475%	32

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Iris Plus Graphics 950
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Iris Plus Graphics 950
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR6X	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s	System
Bus Width	192-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Iris Plus Graphics 950
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Quick Sync 7. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (Iris Plus Graphics 950).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Iris Plus Graphics 950
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	Quick Sync 7
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	Quick Sync 7
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 15W — a 172.1% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Iris Plus Graphics 950
TDP	200W	15W-93%
Recommended PSU	650W	1W-100%
Power Connector	8-pin	Integrated
Length	304mm	—
Height	137mm	—
Slots	3	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	134.6+13%	119.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 launched at $0. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 costs 100+% less ($599 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 950) — the Iris Plus Graphics 950 offers Infinity% better value.