
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- β +2196.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 475.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 7.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022β2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
2013Why buy it
- β Costs $449 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- β Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (1,172 vs 26,919).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.8 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Iris Pro Graphics 5200
2013Why buy it
- β +2196.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 475.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 7.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022β2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Costs $449 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- β Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (1,172 vs 26,919).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.8 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Iris Pro Graphics 5200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Iris Pro Graphics 5200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 13 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 3 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Iris Pro Graphics 5200's 1,172 β the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 2196.8%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses Generation 7.5, both on 5 nm vs 22 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+2197% | 1,172 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Generation 7.5 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 22 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+1740% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+3696% | 0.768 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+106% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+1500% | 4 |
| TMUs | 184+360% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 5200's 30W β a 147.8% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 30W-85% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 304mm | β |
| Height | 137mm | β |
| Slots | 3 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 80Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+244% | 39.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 costs 75% less ($449 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 7.8 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) β the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 475.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $150-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+476% | 7.8 |
| Codename | AD104 | Haswell GT3e |
| Release | April 12 2023 | May 27 2013 |
| Ranking | #32 | #835 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












