GeForce RTX 4070
Iris Pro Graphics 580
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Iris Pro Graphics 580 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Iris Pro Graphics 580 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Iris Pro Graphics 580: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1256.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌344.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 45W.
Iris Pro Graphics 580
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 200W, a 155W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,985 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Iris Pro Graphics 580 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Iris Pro Graphics 580
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,985 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Iris Pro Graphics 580's 1,985 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 1256.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Iris Pro Graphics 580 uses Generation 9.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 576 (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 950 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+1256% | 1,985 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Generation 9.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 5888+922% | 576 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+2565% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+161% | 950 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+611% | 9 |
| TMUs | 184+156% | 72 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics 580 carries 0 MB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and System on the Iris Pro Graphics 580.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs Quick Sync Video (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Quick Sync Video. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 (Iris Pro Graphics 580).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | Quick Sync Video |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Quick Sync Video |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 580's 45W — a 126.5% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0W (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 45W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 0W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 304mm | 0mm |
| Height | 137mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+205% | 44.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the Iris Pro Graphics 580 launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Pro Graphics 580 was 100+% cheaper ($599 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs Infinity (Iris Pro Graphics 580) — the Iris Pro Graphics 580 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | AD104 | Skylake GT4e |
| Release | April 12 2023 | September 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #32 | #707 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 and Iris Pro Graphics 580
