
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

L4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+165.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,746 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,345 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 938% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 4.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,345 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 200W vs 72W.
- ❌79.9% longer card at 304mm vs 169mm.
L4
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 72W instead of 200W, a 128W reduction.
- ✅Measures 169mm instead of 304mm, a 135mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,153 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌291.5% HIGHER MSRP$2,345 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4070
2023L4
2023Why buy it
- ✅+165.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,746 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,345 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 938% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 4.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,345 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 72W instead of 200W, a 128W reduction.
- ✅Measures 169mm instead of 304mm, a 135mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 200W vs 72W.
- ❌79.9% longer card at 304mm vs 169mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,153 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌291.5% HIGHER MSRP$2,345 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than L4?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is L4 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 66 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 457 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 114 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 223 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 93 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and L4

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

L4
L4
The L4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 72W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,153 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the L4's 10,153 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 165.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the L4 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 7,424 (L4). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 30.29 TFLOPS (L4). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2040 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 60 (L4) with 184 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+165% | 10,153 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 7424+26% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS | 30.29 TFLOPS+4% |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+21% | 2040 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 184 | 240+30% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 7.5 MB+29% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB | 48 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 60+30% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 240+30% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The L4 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The L4 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the L4 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 48 MB (L4) — the L4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB | 48 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (L4). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (L4). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC (4x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (L4).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC (4x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the L4's 72W — a 94.1% difference. The L4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 500W (L4). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 169mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 72W-64% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 169mm |
| Height | 137mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 3 | 1-67% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6 | 141.0+5% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the L4 launched at $2345. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 74.5% less ($1746 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4.3 (L4) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 944.2% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-74% | $2345 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+944% | 4.3 |
| Codename | AD104 | AD104 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #32 | #259 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












