
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

M1 8-Core GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- β +438.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- β 500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- β More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022β2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.
M1 8-Core GPU
2020Why buy it
- β Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (5,000 vs 26,919).
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- βWeaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023M1 8-Core GPU
2020Why buy it
- β +438.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- β 500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- β More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022β2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (5,000 vs 26,919).
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- βWeaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than M1 8-Core GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is M1 8-Core GPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 56 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 40 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and M1 8-Core GPU

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
The M1 8-Core GPU is manufactured by Apple. It was released in November 10 2020. The core clock speed is 1278 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the M1 8-Core GPU's 5,000 β the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 438.4%. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8 (M1 8-Core GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+438% | 5,000 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+73500% | 8 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The M1 8-Core GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The M1 8-Core GPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the M1 8-Core GPU has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 68 GB/s (M1 8-Core GPU) β a 641.2% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs Unified.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+641% | 68 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | Unified |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs N/A (M1 8-Core GPU). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.1 (Rosetta 2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+12% | 4.1 (Rosetta 2) |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs Apple M1 Video Encoder (M1 8-Core GPU). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Apple M1 Video Decoder. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,HEVC,ProRes,ProRes RAW (M1 8-Core GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | Apple M1 Video Encoder |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Apple M1 Video Decoder |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,ProRes,ProRes RAW |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the M1 8-Core GPU's 30W β a 147.8% difference. The M1 8-Core GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (M1 8-Core GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 30W-85% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | β |
| Height | 137mm | β |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6 | 166.7+24% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the M1 8-Core GPU launched at $0. The M1 8-Core GPU costs 100+% less ($599 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs Infinity (M1 8-Core GPU) β the M1 8-Core GPU offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | AD104 | β |
| Release | April 12 2023 | November 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #32 | #428 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












