GeForce RTX 4070
NVS 310
GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVS 310 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVS 310 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVS 310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+9688.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 2498.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌194.1% higher power demand at 200W vs 68W.
- ❌109.7% longer card at 304mm vs 145mm.
NVS 310
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $440 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 68W instead of 200W, a 132W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 304mm, a 159mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (275 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVS 310 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
NVS 310
The NVS 310 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 275 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the NVS 310's 275 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 9688.7%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the NVS 310 uses Maxwell, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 512 (NVS 310). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 310). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+9689% | 275 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+1050% | 512 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+2655% | 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+140% | 1033 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 ×2 |
| TMUs | 184+475% | 32 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+2220% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+3500% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The NVS 310 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The NVS 310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the NVS 310 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 64-bit on the NVS 310. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1 MB (NVS 310) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+2300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+3500% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (11_0) (NVS 310). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs Fermi NVENC (NVS 310). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (NVS 310).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | Fermi NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the NVS 310's 68W — a 98.5% difference. The NVS 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (NVS 310). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 145mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 68W-66% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 145mm |
| Height | 137mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 3 | 1-67% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+3265% | 4.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the NVS 310 launched at $159. On MSRP, NVS 310 was 73.5% cheaper ($440 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1.7 (NVS 310) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 2541.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $159-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+2541% | 1.7 |
| Codename | AD104 | GM107 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | November 4 2015 |
| Ranking | #32 | #826 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 and NVS 310
