GeForce RTX 4070
P106-090
GeForce RTX 4070 vs P106-090 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 vs P106-090 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce RTX 4070 vs P106-090: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+991.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 608.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $389 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
- ❌21.6% longer card at 304mm vs 250mm.
P106-090
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $210 less on MSRP ($389 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Measures 250mm instead of 304mm, a 54mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,466 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($389 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 vs P106-090 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
P106-090
The P106-090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 31 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1354 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,466 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the P106-090's 2,466 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 991.6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the P106-090 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 768 (P106-090). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2.352 TFLOPS (P106-090). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+992% | 2,466 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+667% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+1139% | 2.352 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+62% | 1531 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 184+283% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+1971% | 0.28 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+2300% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The P106-090 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The P106-090 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the P106-090 carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 64-bit on the P106-090. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1.5 MB (P106-090) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+2300% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (P106-090). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC (Pascal) (P106-090). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (P106-090).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the P106-090's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The P106-090 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (P106-090). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 250mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 60°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 75W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 250mm |
| Height | 137mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 60°C-25% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+309% | 32.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the P106-090 launched at $389. On MSRP, P106-090 was 35.1% cheaper ($210 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 6.3 (P106-090) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 612.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $389-35% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+613% | 6.3 |
| Codename | AD104 | GP106 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | July 31 2017 |
| Ranking | #32 | #639 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 and P106-090
