GeForce RTX 4070 vs Quadro 3000M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅+2589.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.

Quadro 3000M

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,001 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Quadro 3000M

2011

Why buy it

✅+2589.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,001 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Quadro 3000M?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 1,001 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Quadro 3000M is a 2011 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2011, 2589.2% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 2 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $599 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 2589.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro 3000M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro 3000M is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

Quadro 3000M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro 3000M
1080p
low	183 FPS	41 FPS
medium	167 FPS	33 FPS
high	151 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	13 FPS
1440p
low	150 FPS	23 FPS
medium	124 FPS	17 FPS
high	110 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	9 FPS
medium	78 FPS	8 FPS
high	65 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	4 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Quadro 3000M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro 3000M
1080p
low	544 FPS	45 FPS
medium	454 FPS	36 FPS
high	353 FPS	30 FPS
ultra	299 FPS	23 FPS
1440p
low	351 FPS	34 FPS
medium	288 FPS	23 FPS
high	235 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	11 FPS
4K
low	172 FPS	15 FPS
medium	144 FPS	9 FPS
high	125 FPS	7 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	5 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Quadro 3000M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro 3000M
1080p
low	884 FPS	45 FPS
medium	713 FPS	36 FPS
high	643 FPS	30 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	23 FPS
1440p
low	684 FPS	34 FPS
medium	549 FPS	27 FPS
high	483 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	17 FPS
4K
low	467 FPS	23 FPS
medium	373 FPS	18 FPS
high	326 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	11 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Quadro 3000M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro 3000M
1080p
low	751 FPS	45 FPS
medium	612 FPS	36 FPS
high	536 FPS	30 FPS
ultra	497 FPS	23 FPS
1440p
low	615 FPS	14 FPS
medium	500 FPS	11 FPS
high	433 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	395 FPS	8 FPS
4K
low	384 FPS	10 FPS
medium	324 FPS	7 FPS
high	301 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	4 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Quadro 3000M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Quadro 3000M

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro 3000M

The Quadro 3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,001 points. Launch price was $398.96.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Quadro 3000M's 1,001 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 2589.2%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro 3000M uses Fermi, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 240 (Quadro 3000M). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.432 TFLOPS (Quadro 3000M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro 3000M
G3D Mark Score	26,919+2589%	1,001
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Fermi
Process Node	5 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	5888+2353%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+6648%	0.432 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	184+360%	40
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+1771%	0.31 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+7100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro 3000M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro 3000M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro 3000M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 3000M has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro 3000M) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro 3000M
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+500%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	36 MB+7100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Quadro 3000M's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The Quadro 3000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Quadro 3000M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro 3000M
TDP	200W	75W-63%
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	—
Height	137mm	—
Slots	3	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	134.6+912%	13.3