G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Quadro CX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Quadro CX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅1326.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 9386.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.

Quadro CX

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
233.7% HIGHER MSRP
$1,999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1326.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2742.6% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 947), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Quadro CX is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 55nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,400 cheaper on MSRP at $599 vs $1,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 9386.3% (44.9 vs 0.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Quadro CX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro CX

The Quadro CX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points. Launch price was $1,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Quadro CX's 947 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 2742.6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro CX uses Tesla 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 192 (Quadro CX). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro CX).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro CX
G3D Mark Score	26,919+2743%	947
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	5888+2967%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+6205%	0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+167%	24
TMUs	184+188%	64
L2 Cache	36 MB+18847%	0.19 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro CX does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro CX leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro CX
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro CX carries 4 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 64-bit on the Quadro CX. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro CX) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro CX
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	36 MB+18847%	0.19 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 11.1 (10_0) (Quadro CX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro CX
DirectX	12.2+10%	11.1 (10_0)
Vulkan	1.3	N/A
OpenGL	4.6+39%	3.3
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs None (Quadro CX). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro CX).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro CX
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	None
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	PureVideo HD
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Quadro CX's 150W — a 28.6% difference. The Quadro CX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Quadro CX). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro CX
TDP	200W	150W-25%
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	267mm
Height	137mm	111mm
Slots	3	2-33%
Temp (Load)	80°C	80
Perf/Watt	134.6+2037%	6.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the Quadro CX launched at $1999. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 was 70% cheaper ($1400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.5 (Quadro CX) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 8880% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro CX
MSRP	$599-70%	$1999
Performance per Dollar	44.9+8880%	0.5
Codename	AD104	GT200B
Release	April 12 2023	November 11 2008
Ranking	#32	#901

Search GeForce RTX 4070 on Amazon

Search Quadro CX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.