GeForce RTX 4070
Quadro K2000
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Quadro K2000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Quadro K2000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Quadro K2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅1526.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 1601.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌292.2% higher power demand at 200W vs 51W.
- ❌50.5% longer card at 304mm vs 202mm.
Quadro K2000
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 51W instead of 200W, a 149W reduction.
- ✅Measures 202mm instead of 304mm, a 102mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Quadro K2000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Quadro K2000
The Quadro K2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Quadro K2000's 1,582 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 1601.6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro K2000 uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 384 (Quadro K2000). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+1602% | 1,582 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Kepler |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+1433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+3878% | 0.7327 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 184+475% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+19233% | 0.03 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+14300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro K2000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K2000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2000 carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 64-bit on the Quadro K2000. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro K2000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+14300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC 1st gen (Quadro K2000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264 (Quadro K2000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 1st gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Quadro K2000's 51W — a 118.7% difference. The Quadro K2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Quadro K2000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 202mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 51W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 202mm |
| Height | 137mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 1-67% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+334% | 31.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the Quadro K2000 launched at $599. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2.6 (Quadro K2000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 1626.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+1627% | 2.6 |
| Codename | AD104 | GK107 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | March 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #32 | #756 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 and Quadro K2000
