GeForce RTX 4070
Quadro K6000
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Quadro K6000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Quadro K6000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Quadro K6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅130.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $4,666 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2860.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌14.7% longer card at 304mm vs 265mm.
Quadro K6000
2013Why buy it
- ✅Measures 265mm instead of 304mm, a 39mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2013 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌779% HIGHER MSRP$5,265 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Quadro K6000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Quadro K6000
The Quadro K6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,993 points. Launch price was $5,265.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Quadro K6000's 7,993 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 236.8%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro K6000 uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,880 (Quadro K6000). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K6000). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 902 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+237% | 7,993 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Kepler |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+104% | 2880 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+461% | 5.196 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+174% | 902 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 184 | 240+30% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+2422% | 0.23 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+2300% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro K6000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K6000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 12 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro K6000) — a 138.9% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 256-bit on the Quadro K6000. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro K6000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+139% | 211 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+2300% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 11.0 (Quadro K6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+11% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC 1.0 (Quadro K6000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro K6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC 1.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Quadro K6000's 225W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Quadro K6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 265mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-11% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 265mm |
| Height | 137mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+279% | 35.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the Quadro K6000 launched at $5265. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 was 88.6% cheaper ($4666 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1.5 (Quadro K6000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 2893.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-89% | $5265 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+2893% | 1.5 |
| Codename | AD104 | GK110B |
| Release | April 12 2023 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #32 | #318 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 and Quadro K6000
