G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Quadro M2000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Quadro M2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅388.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
❌82% longer card at 304mm vs 167mm.

Quadro M2000

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
✅Measures 167mm instead of 304mm, a 137mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 388.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 568.6% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 4,026), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Quadro M2000 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Quadro M2000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro M2000

The Quadro M2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 796 MHz to 1163 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,026 points. Launch price was $437.75.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Quadro M2000's 4,026 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 568.6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro M2000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 768 (Quadro M2000). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1.786 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1163 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro M2000
G3D Mark Score	26,919+569%	4,026
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	5888+667%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+1532%	1.786 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+113%	1163 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	184+283%	48
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+1971%	0.28 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+3500%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro M2000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M2000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro M2000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M2000 carries 4 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 64-bit on the Quadro M2000. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1 MB (Quadro M2000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro M2000
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	36 MB+3500%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12_1 (Quadro M2000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro M2000
DirectX	12.2+2%	12_1
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro M2000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro M2000
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	NVENC 2nd Gen
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC 2nd Gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Quadro M2000's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The Quadro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Quadro M2000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 167mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro M2000
TDP	200W	75W-63%
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	167mm
Height	137mm	—
Slots	3	1-67%
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	134.6+151%	53.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the Quadro M2000 launched at $0. On MSRP, Quadro M2000 was 100+% cheaper ($599 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs Infinity (Quadro M2000) — the Quadro M2000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2016).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro M2000
MSRP	$599	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	44.9	Infinity
Codename	AD104	GM206
Release	April 12 2023	April 8 2016
Ranking	#32	#491

Search GeForce RTX 4070 on Amazon

Search Quadro M2000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.