G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅+128.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $4,400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1808.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.

Quadro M6000

2015

Why buy it

✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,769 vs 26,919).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
734.6% HIGHER MSRP
$4,999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Quadro M6000

2015

Why buy it

✅+128.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $4,400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1808.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,769 vs 26,919).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
734.6% HIGHER MSRP
$4,999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Quadro M6000?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 11,769 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Quadro M6000 is a 2015 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015, 128.7% more raw performance headroom, better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 5nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 is about $4,400 cheaper on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $4,999 MSRP, and you are getting 128.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 1808.9%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro M6000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro M6000 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $4,999 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

Quadro M6000 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro M6000
1080p
low	183 FPS	154 FPS
medium	167 FPS	133 FPS
high	151 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	69 FPS
1440p
low	150 FPS	124 FPS
medium	124 FPS	106 FPS
high	110 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	50 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	42 FPS
medium	78 FPS	38 FPS
high	65 FPS	24 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	20 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Quadro M6000

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro M6000
1080p
low	544 FPS	202 FPS
medium	454 FPS	178 FPS
high	353 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	299 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	351 FPS	135 FPS
medium	288 FPS	108 FPS
high	235 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	65 FPS
4K
low	172 FPS	61 FPS
medium	144 FPS	51 FPS
high	125 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	37 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Quadro M6000

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro M6000
1080p
low	884 FPS	530 FPS
medium	713 FPS	424 FPS
high	643 FPS	353 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	265 FPS
1440p
low	684 FPS	397 FPS
medium	549 FPS	318 FPS
high	483 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	199 FPS
4K
low	467 FPS	265 FPS
medium	373 FPS	212 FPS
high	326 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	132 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Quadro M6000

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro M6000
1080p
low	751 FPS	286 FPS
medium	612 FPS	246 FPS
high	536 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	497 FPS	163 FPS
1440p
low	615 FPS	212 FPS
medium	500 FPS	188 FPS
high	433 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	395 FPS	117 FPS
4K
low	384 FPS	120 FPS
medium	324 FPS	96 FPS
high	301 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	61 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Quadro M6000

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Quadro M6000

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro M6000

The Quadro M6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,769 points. Launch price was $4,199.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Quadro M6000's 11,769 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 128.7%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro M6000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1114 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro M6000
G3D Mark Score	26,919+129%	11,769
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	5888+92%	3072
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+326%	6.844 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+122%	1114 MHz
ROPs	64	96+50%
TMUs	184	192+4%
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+427%	1.1 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+1100%	3 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro M6000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M6000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro M6000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 12 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000) — a 59% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro M6000
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	12 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s+59%	317 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit	384-bit+100%
L2 Cache	36 MB+1100%	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro M6000
DirectX	12.2+2%	12/1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro M6000
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	NVENC 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Quadro M6000's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 500W (Quadro M6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro M6000
TDP	200W-20%	250W
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	267mm
Height	137mm	112mm
Slots	3	2-33%
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	134.6+186%	47.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Quadro M6000 launched at $4999. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 88% less ($4400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2.4 (Quadro M6000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 1770.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).