G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅+186.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 105.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅140% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 5 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
❌51.2% longer card at 304mm vs 201mm.

Quadro P2200

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
✅Measures 201mm instead of 304mm, a 103mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,386 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Quadro P2200

2019

Why buy it

✅+186.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 105.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅140% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 5 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
✅Measures 201mm instead of 304mm, a 103mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
❌51.2% longer card at 304mm vs 201mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,386 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Quadro P2200?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 9,386 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Quadro P2200 is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019, 186.8% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 5 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 is about 39.6% more expensive on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $429 MSRP, and you are getting 186.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 105.4%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro P2200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro P2200 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $429 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

Quadro P2200 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P2200
1080p
low	183 FPS	81 FPS
medium	167 FPS	69 FPS
high	151 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	37 FPS
1440p
low	150 FPS	71 FPS
medium	124 FPS	61 FPS
high	110 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	29 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	25 FPS
medium	78 FPS	24 FPS
high	65 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	14 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Quadro P2200

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P2200
1080p
low	544 FPS	156 FPS
medium	454 FPS	120 FPS
high	353 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	299 FPS	61 FPS
1440p
low	351 FPS	108 FPS
medium	288 FPS	80 FPS
high	235 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	45 FPS
4K
low	172 FPS	55 FPS
medium	144 FPS	42 FPS
high	125 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	23 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Quadro P2200

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P2200
1080p
low	884 FPS	333 FPS
medium	713 FPS	295 FPS
high	643 FPS	220 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	184 FPS
1440p
low	684 FPS	249 FPS
medium	549 FPS	225 FPS
high	483 FPS	175 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	137 FPS
4K
low	467 FPS	163 FPS
medium	373 FPS	141 FPS
high	326 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	60 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Quadro P2200

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P2200
1080p
low	751 FPS	147 FPS
medium	612 FPS	120 FPS
high	536 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	497 FPS	87 FPS
1440p
low	615 FPS	105 FPS
medium	500 FPS	86 FPS
high	433 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	395 FPS	61 FPS
4K
low	384 FPS	62 FPS
medium	324 FPS	48 FPS
high	301 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	28 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Quadro P2200

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Quadro P2200

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro P2200

The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Quadro P2200's 9,386 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 186.8%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro P2200 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1,280 (Quadro P2200). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1493 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P2200
G3D Mark Score	26,919+187%	9,386
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Pascal
Process Node	5 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	5888+360%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+663%	3.822 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+66%	1493 MHz
ROPs	64+60%	40
TMUs	184+130%	80
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+1134%	0.47 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+2780%	1.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P2200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P2200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P2200
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2200 has 5 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 140% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P2200
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+140%	5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	36 MB+2780%	1.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.1 (Quadro P2200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P2200
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P2200
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	6th Gen NVENC
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	3rd Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Quadro P2200's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The Quadro P2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 500W (Quadro P2200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 201mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P2200
TDP	200W	75W-63%
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	201mm
Height	137mm	111mm
Slots	3	1-67%
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	134.6+8%	125.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Quadro P2200 launched at $429. The Quadro P2200 costs 28.4% less ($170 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 21.9 (Quadro P2200) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 105% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).