G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅92.2% more average FPS across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 322.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 10.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quadro P3000

2016

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
0.2% HIGHER MSRP
$600 MSRPvs$599 MSRP

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Quadro P3000

2016

Why buy it

✅92.2% more average FPS across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 322.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 10.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
0.2% HIGHER MSRP
$600 MSRPvs$599 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Quadro P3000?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4070 averages 92.2% more FPS across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 6,384 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Quadro P3000 is a 2016 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2016, 321.7% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 6 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 is about $1 cheaper on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $600 MSRP, and you are getting 92.2% more estimated average FPS across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data and 321.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 322.4%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro P3000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro P3000 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $600 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

Quadro P3000 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P3000
1080p
low	183 FPS	112 FPS
medium	167 FPS	102 FPS
high	151 FPS	87 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	74 FPS
1440p
low	150 FPS	99 FPS
medium	124 FPS	85 FPS
high	110 FPS	72 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	63 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	52 FPS
medium	78 FPS	47 FPS
high	65 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	34 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Quadro P3000

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P3000
1080p
low	544 FPS	287 FPS
medium	454 FPS	230 FPS
high	353 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	299 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	351 FPS	212 FPS
medium	288 FPS	172 FPS
high	235 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	108 FPS
4K
low	172 FPS	102 FPS
medium	144 FPS	85 FPS
high	125 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	57 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Quadro P3000

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P3000
1080p
low	884 FPS	287 FPS
medium	713 FPS	230 FPS
high	643 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	684 FPS	215 FPS
medium	549 FPS	172 FPS
high	483 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	108 FPS
4K
low	467 FPS	144 FPS
medium	373 FPS	115 FPS
high	326 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	72 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Quadro P3000

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P3000
1080p
low	751 FPS	287 FPS
medium	612 FPS	230 FPS
high	536 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	497 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	615 FPS	215 FPS
medium	500 FPS	172 FPS
high	433 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	395 FPS	108 FPS
4K
low	384 FPS	144 FPS
medium	324 FPS	115 FPS
high	301 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	72 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Quadro P3000

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Quadro P3000

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro P3000

The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Quadro P3000's 6,384 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 321.7%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro P3000 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3,840 (Quadro P3000). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1645 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P3000
G3D Mark Score	26,919+322%	6,384
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Pascal
Process Node	5 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	5888+53%	3840
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+131%	12.63 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+50%	1645 MHz
ROPs	64	96+50%
TMUs	184	240+30%
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+314%	1.4 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+1100%	3 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P3000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P3000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P3000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3000 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3 MB (Quadro P3000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P3000
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+100%	6 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	36 MB+1100%	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P3000
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P3000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P3000
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	3rd Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Quadro P3000's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Quadro P3000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P3000
TDP	200W-20%	250W
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	—
Height	137mm	—
Slots	3	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	134.6+428%	25.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Quadro P3000 launched at $600. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 0.2% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 10.6 (Quadro P3000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 323.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).