G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅106.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.

Quadro P5200 Max-Q

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Quadro P5200 Max-Q

2018

Why buy it

✅106.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Quadro P5200 Max-Q?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4070 averages 106.8% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 12,308 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Quadro P5200 Max-Q is a 2018 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2018, 118.7% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $599 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 106.8% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 118.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro P5200 Max-Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro P5200 Max-Q is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

Quadro P5200 Max-Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P5200 Max-Q
1080p
low	183 FPS	109 FPS
medium	167 FPS	99 FPS
high	151 FPS	84 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	71 FPS
1440p
low	150 FPS	96 FPS
medium	124 FPS	82 FPS
high	110 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	59 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	49 FPS
medium	78 FPS	43 FPS
high	65 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	31 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P5200 Max-Q
1080p
low	544 FPS	242 FPS
medium	454 FPS	205 FPS
high	353 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	299 FPS	126 FPS
1440p
low	351 FPS	166 FPS
medium	288 FPS	140 FPS
high	235 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	91 FPS
4K
low	172 FPS	96 FPS
medium	144 FPS	79 FPS
high	125 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	52 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P5200 Max-Q
1080p
low	884 FPS	501 FPS
medium	713 FPS	430 FPS
high	643 FPS	363 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	277 FPS
1440p
low	684 FPS	399 FPS
medium	549 FPS	332 FPS
high	483 FPS	277 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	208 FPS
4K
low	467 FPS	243 FPS
medium	373 FPS	201 FPS
high	326 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	120 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Quadro P5200 Max-Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P5200 Max-Q
1080p
low	751 FPS	299 FPS
medium	612 FPS	237 FPS
high	536 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	497 FPS	178 FPS
1440p
low	615 FPS	233 FPS
medium	500 FPS	185 FPS
high	433 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	395 FPS	132 FPS
4K
low	384 FPS	120 FPS
medium	324 FPS	93 FPS
high	301 FPS	84 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	68 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Quadro P5200 Max-Q

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro P5200 Max-Q

The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1316 MHz to 1569 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,308 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Quadro P5200 Max-Q's 12,308 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 118.7%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro P5200 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8.033 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1569 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P5200 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score	26,919+119%	12,308
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Pascal
Process Node	5 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	5888+130%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+263%	8.033 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+58%	1569 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	184+15%	160
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+517%	0.94 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+1700%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P5200 Max-Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P5200 Max-Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 Max-Q has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P5200 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	36 MB+1700%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P5200 Max-Q
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200 Max-Q).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	NVENC 5.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	PureVideo HD VP7
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Quadro P5200 Max-Q's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 500W (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P5200 Max-Q
TDP	200W	100W-50%
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	0mm
Height	137mm	0mm
Slots	3	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	134.6+9%	123.1