
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅74.2% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 170.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 288), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 200W vs 160W.
- ❌26.1% longer card at 304mm vs 241mm.
Quadro RTX 4000
2018Why buy it
- ✅56.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (288 vs 184).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 200W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 304mm, a 63mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌50.1% HIGHER MSRP$899 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Quadro RTX 4000
2018Why buy it
- ✅74.2% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 170.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅56.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (288 vs 184).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 200W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 304mm, a 63mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 288), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 200W vs 160W.
- ❌26.1% longer card at 304mm vs 241mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌50.1% HIGHER MSRP$899 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Quadro RTX 4000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 4000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 537 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 168 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 58 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Quadro RTX 4000

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro RTX 4000
The Quadro RTX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1005 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,925 points. Launch price was $899.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Quadro RTX 4000's 14,925 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 80.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 4000 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,304 (Quadro RTX 4000). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1545 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 36 (Quadro RTX 4000) with 184 Tensor cores vs 288.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+80% | 14,925 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+156% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+309% | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+60% | 1545 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+28% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+152% | 2.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+800% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+28% | 36 |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 288+57% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 4000) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+13% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+800% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 4000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Quadro RTX 4000's 160W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 241mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 160W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 241mm |
| Height | 137mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+44% | 93.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX 4000 launched at $899. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 33.4% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 16.6 (Quadro RTX 4000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 170.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-33% | $899 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+170% | 16.6 |
| Codename | AD104 | TU104 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | November 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #32 | #154 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












