
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅55.4% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $301 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 35% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (26,919 vs 29,964).
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌81.8% higher power demand at 200W vs 110W.
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅+11.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅73.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 184).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 200W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌50.3% HIGHER MSRP$900 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.3 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($900 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅55.4% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $301 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 35% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅+11.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅73.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 184).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 200W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (26,919 vs 29,964).
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌81.8% higher power demand at 200W vs 110W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌50.3% HIGHER MSRP$900 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.3 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($900 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 256 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 159 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 62 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 745 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 615 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 547 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 477 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 388 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 202 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 58 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)'s 29,964 — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) leads by 11.3%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 40 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) with 184 Tensor cores vs 320.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919 | 29,964+11% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+130% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+265% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+59% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+15% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+132% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+800% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+15% | 40 |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 320+74% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+800% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)'s 110W — a 58.1% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 110W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 0mm |
| Height | 137mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6 | 272.4+102% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) launched at $900. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 33.4% less ($301 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 33.3 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 34.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-33% | $900 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+35% | 33.3 |
| Codename | AD104 | TU104 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #32 | #201 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












