G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Quadro RTX 5000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Quadro RTX 5000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅16.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,700 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 569% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 200W instead of 230W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 384), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

Quadro RTX 5000

2018

Why buy it

✅108.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (384 vs 184).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌
283.8% HIGHER MSRP
$2,299 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($2,299 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
❌15% higher power demand at 230W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 16.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 74.3% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 15,443), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 12nm and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,700 cheaper on MSRP at $599 vs $2,299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 569% (44.9 vs 6.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Quadro RTX 5000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro RTX 5000

The Quadro RTX 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 1815 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,443 points. Launch price was $2,299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Quadro RTX 5000's 15,443 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 74.3%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 5000 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 11.15 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1815 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 48 (Quadro RTX 5000) with 184 Tensor cores vs 384.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro RTX 5000
G3D Mark Score	26,919+74%	15,443
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Turing
Process Node	5 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	5888+92%	3072
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+161%	11.15 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+36%	1815 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	184	192+4%
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+93%	3 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+800%	4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	46	48+4%
Tensor Cores	184	384+109%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both cards support Frame Generation, but the Quadro RTX 5000 is on the newer stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the GeForce RTX 4070 stays on DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The Quadro RTX 5000 supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro RTX 5000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	DLSS 4 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14%
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	Yes (DLSS 4)+14%
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 5000 carries 16 GB. Quadro RTX 5000 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 5000) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 5000. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 5000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro RTX 5000
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	16 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s+13%	448 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	36 MB+800%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX 5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro RTX 5000
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX 5000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (Quadro RTX 5000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro RTX 5000
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	NVENC (7th Gen)
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC (4th Gen)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Quadro RTX 5000's 230W — a 14% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 5000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro RTX 5000
TDP	200W-13%	230W
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	—
Height	137mm	—
Slots	3	2-33%
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	134.6+101%	67.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the Quadro RTX 5000 launched at $2299. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 was 73.9% cheaper ($1700 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 6.7 (Quadro RTX 5000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 570.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2018).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro RTX 5000
MSRP	$599-74%	$2299
Performance per Dollar	44.9+570%	6.7
Codename	AD104	TU104
Release	April 12 2023	August 13 2018
Ranking	#32	#143

Search GeForce RTX 4070 on Amazon

Search Quadro RTX 5000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.