
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Quadro T1000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+438.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 349.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,000 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Quadro T1000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅+438.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 349.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,000 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Quadro T1000 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro T1000 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 56 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Quadro T1000 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro T1000 (móvel)
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Quadro T1000 (móvel)'s 5,000 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 438.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro T1000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 768 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2.235 TFLOPS (Quadro T1000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+438% | 5,000 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+667% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+1204% | 2.235 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+70% | 1455 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 184+283% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+673% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+3500% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T1000 (móvel) has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1 MB (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+3500% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Quadro T1000 (móvel)'s 50W — a 120% difference. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Quadro T1000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 50W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | — |
| Height | 137mm | — |
| Slots | 3 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+35% | 100.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Quadro T1000 (móvel) launched at $500. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) costs 16.5% less ($99 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 10.0 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 349% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $500-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+349% | 10.0 |
| Codename | AD104 | TU117 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #32 | #374 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












