GeForce RTX 4070 vs RADEON 9200 SE

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

2023Core: 1920 MHzBoost: 2475 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON 9200 SE

2025Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 4070 vs RADEON 9200 SE Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs RADEON 9200 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs RADEON 9200 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

  • 19124.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 44839.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 4700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 256 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 263.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 55W.
  • 81% longer card at 304mm vs 168mm.

RADEON 9200 SE

2025

Why buy it

  • Costs $569 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Draws 55W instead of 200W, a 145W reduction.
  • Measures 168mm instead of 304mm, a 136mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 19124.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 897200% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 3), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 256 MB of VRAM, native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while RADEON 9200 SE has no comparable frame-generation support, and 46 vs 40 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $569 more expensive on MSRP at $599 vs $30, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 44839.9% (44.9 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs RADEON 9200 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

RADEON 9200 SE

The RADEON 9200 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the RADEON 9200 SE's 3 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 897200%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RADEON 9200 SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9200 SE). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200 SE). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 40 (RADEON 9200 SE) with 184 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070RADEON 9200 SE
G3D Mark Score
26,919+897200%
3
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
5 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
5888+130%
2560
Compute (TFLOPS)
29.15 TFLOPS+96%
14.85 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2475 MHz
2900 MHz+17%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
184+15%
160
L2 Cache
36 MB+350%
8 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
46+15%
40

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RADEON 9200 SE does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9200 SE leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070RADEON 9200 SE
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9200 SE carries 256 MB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 4700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9200 SE. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9200 SE) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070RADEON 9200 SE
VRAM Capacity
12 GB+4700%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6X
GDDR5
Bus Width
192-bit+200%
64-bit
L2 Cache
36 MB+350%
8 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8.1 (RADEON 9200 SE). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070RADEON 9200 SE
DirectX
12.2+51%
8.1
Vulkan
1.3
N/A
OpenGL
4.6+254%
1.3
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs None (RADEON 9200 SE). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON 9200 SE).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070RADEON 9200 SE
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC (2x)
None
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
None
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the RADEON 9200 SE's 55W — a 113.7% difference. The RADEON 9200 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (RADEON 9200 SE). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Legacy. Card length: 304mm vs 168mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 60.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070RADEON 9200 SE
TDP
200W
55W-73%
Recommended PSU
650W
350W-46%
Power Connector
8-pin
Legacy
Length
304mm
168mm
Height
137mm
111mm
Slots
3
1-67%
Temp (Load)
80°C
60-25%
Perf/Watt
134.6+134500%
0.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the RADEON 9200 SE launched at $30. On MSRP, RADEON 9200 SE was 95% cheaper ($569 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9200 SE) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 44800% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9200 SE (2025 vs 2023).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070RADEON 9200 SE
MSRP
$599
$30-95%
Performance per Dollar
44.9+44800%
0.1
Codename
AD104
Strix Halo
Release
April 12 2023
January 6 2025
Ranking
#32
#98

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.