G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅+3373.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 305.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌23.6% longer card at 304mm vs 246mm.

Radeon HD 4810

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $529 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Measures 246mm instead of 304mm, a 58mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (775 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2009-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Radeon HD 4810

2009

Why buy it

✅+3373.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 305.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $529 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Measures 246mm instead of 304mm, a 58mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌23.6% longer card at 304mm vs 246mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (775 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2009-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon HD 4810?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 775 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon HD 4810 is a 2009 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2009, 3373.4% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 512 MB, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 4070 is about 755.7% more expensive on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $70 MSRP, and you are getting 3373.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon HD 4810 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon HD 4810 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon HD 4810 is 2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM, 775 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 4810 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon HD 4810
1080p
low	183 FPS	29 FPS
medium	167 FPS	17 FPS
high	151 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	5 FPS
1440p
low	150 FPS	14 FPS
medium	124 FPS	7 FPS
high	110 FPS	3 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	2 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	5 FPS
medium	78 FPS	3 FPS
high	65 FPS	2 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	1 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon HD 4810

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon HD 4810
1080p
low	544 FPS	35 FPS
medium	454 FPS	28 FPS
high	353 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	299 FPS	14 FPS
1440p
low	351 FPS	24 FPS
medium	288 FPS	14 FPS
high	235 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	7 FPS
4K
low	172 FPS	7 FPS
medium	144 FPS	4 FPS
high	125 FPS	3 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	2 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon HD 4810

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon HD 4810
1080p
low	884 FPS	35 FPS
medium	713 FPS	28 FPS
high	643 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	17 FPS
1440p
low	684 FPS	26 FPS
medium	549 FPS	21 FPS
high	483 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	13 FPS
4K
low	467 FPS	17 FPS
medium	373 FPS	14 FPS
high	326 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	9 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon HD 4810

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon HD 4810
1080p
low	751 FPS	35 FPS
medium	612 FPS	28 FPS
high	536 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	497 FPS	17 FPS
1440p
low	615 FPS	26 FPS
medium	500 FPS	20 FPS
high	433 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	395 FPS	11 FPS
4K
low	384 FPS	17 FPS
medium	324 FPS	12 FPS
high	301 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	6 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon HD 4810

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon HD 4810

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon HD 4810

The Radeon HD 4810 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon HD 4810's 775 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 3373.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon HD 4810 uses TeraScale, both on 5 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4810). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4810).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon HD 4810
G3D Mark Score	26,919+3373%	775
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	TeraScale
Process Node	5 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	5888+636%	800
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+2043%	1.36 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	184+360%	40
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+3525%	0.16 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+14300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon HD 4810 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 4810 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon HD 4810
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4810 has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 2300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4810) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon HD 4810
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+2300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	36 MB+14300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4810). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon HD 4810
DirectX	12.2+21%	10.1
Vulkan	1.3	N/A
OpenGL	4.6+39%	3.3
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs None (Radeon HD 4810). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Radeon HD 4810).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon HD 4810
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	None
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	UVD 2.2
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon HD 4810's 190W — a 5.1% difference. The Radeon HD 4810 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4810). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 246mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 95.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon HD 4810
TDP	200W	190W-5%
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	304mm	246mm
Height	137mm	111mm
Slots	3	1-67%
Temp (Load)	80°C-16%	95
Perf/Watt	134.6+3183%	4.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 4810 launched at $70. The Radeon HD 4810 costs 88.3% less ($529 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 11.1 (Radeon HD 4810) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 304.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2009).