GeForce RTX 4070
Radeon Pro
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon Pro Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon Pro FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon Pro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅282.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌26.1% longer card at 304mm vs 241mm.
Radeon Pro
2020Why buy it
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 304mm, a 63mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon Pro Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Radeon Pro
The Radeon Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,366 points. Launch price was $1,899.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon Pro's 2,366 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 1037.7%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro uses GCN 5.1, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3,840 (Radeon Pro). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1700 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+1038% | 2,366 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+53% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+123% | 13.06 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+46% | 1700 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 184 | 240+30% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+517% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+800% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+800% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs Unified Video Decoder (Radeon Pro). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Unified Video Decoder.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | Unified Video Decoder |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Unified Video Decoder |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Radeon Pro). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 241mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 241mm |
| Height | 137mm | — |
| Slots | 3 | 1-67% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+1317% | 9.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the Radeon Pro launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro was 100+% cheaper ($599 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro) — the Radeon Pro offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | AD104 | Vega 20 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | May 13 2020 |
| Ranking | #32 | #194 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon Pro
