GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon Pro 460

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon Pro 460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon Pro 460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅397.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 550.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 6.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌471.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 35W.

Radeon Pro 460

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 200W, a 165W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.9 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 397.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 679.6% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 3,453), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon Pro 460 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 14nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $99 more expensive on MSRP at $599 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 550.7% (44.9 vs 6.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon Pro 460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon Pro 460

The Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,453 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon Pro 460's 3,453 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 679.6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro 460 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 460). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 460). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 907 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon Pro 460
G3D Mark Score	26,919+680%	3,453
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 4.0
Process Node	5 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	5888+475%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+1469%	1.858 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+173%	907 MHz
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	184+188%	64
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+2220%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+3500%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro 460 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 460 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon Pro 460
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 460 carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 460. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 460) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon Pro 460
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+500%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	36 MB+3500%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro 460's 35W — a 140.4% difference. The Radeon Pro 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 460). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon Pro 460
TDP	200W	35W-83%
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	—
Height	137mm	—
Slots	3	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	134.6+36%	98.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the Radeon Pro 460 launched at $500. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 460 was 16.5% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 6.9 (Radeon Pro 460) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 550.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2016).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon Pro 460
MSRP	$599	$500-17%
Performance per Dollar	44.9+551%	6.9
Codename	AD104	Baffin
Release	April 12 2023	October 30 2016
Ranking	#32	#547

Search GeForce RTX 4070 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 460 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.