
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+116.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 80.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 24.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌53.8% higher power demand at 200W vs 130W.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 200W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,442 vs 26,919).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.9 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅+116.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 80.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 24.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 200W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌53.8% higher power demand at 200W vs 130W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,442 vs 26,919).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.9 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon Pro 5700 XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5700 XT still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 64 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 41 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 140 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 217 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon Pro 5700 XT

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon Pro 5700 XT's 12,442 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 116.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1499 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+116% | 12,442 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+130% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+280% | 7.675 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+65% | 1499 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+15% | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+800% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+800% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Unified Video Decoder 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | RDNA 1.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro 5700 XT's 130W — a 42.4% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 130W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | — |
| Height | 137mm | — |
| Slots | 3 | 1-67% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+41% | 95.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT launched at $500. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT costs 16.5% less ($99 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 24.9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 80.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $500-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+80% | 24.9 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 10 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #32 | #215 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












