GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

2023Core: 1920 MHzBoost: 2475 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 48

2019Core: 1200 MHzBoost: 1300 MHz

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

  • 112.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 79.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.

Radeon Pro Vega 48

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $149 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 25.0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 112.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 138.9% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 11,270), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon Pro Vega 48 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 14nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $149 more expensive on MSRP at $599 vs $450, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 79.4% (44.9 vs 25.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 48

The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,270 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon Pro Vega 48's 11,270 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 138.9%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 uses GCN 5.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3,072 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1300 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Radeon Pro Vega 48
G3D Mark Score
26,919+139%
11,270
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GCN 5.0
Process Node
5 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
5888+92%
3072
Compute (TFLOPS)
29.15 TFLOPS+265%
7.987 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2475 MHz+90%
1300 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
184
192+4%
L1 Cache
5.8 MB+673%
0.75 MB
L2 Cache
36 MB+800%
4 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Radeon Pro Vega 48
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 carries 0 MB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 48. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 48) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Radeon Pro Vega 48
VRAM Capacity
12 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR6X
GDDR6
Bus Width
192-bit+50%
128-bit
L2 Cache
36 MB+800%
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Radeon Pro Vega 48
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 48).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Radeon Pro Vega 48
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC (2x)
VCE 4.0
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
UVD 7.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 48's 30W — a 147.8% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Radeon Pro Vega 48
TDP
200W
30W-85%
Recommended PSU
650W
1W-100%
Power Connector
8-pin
Integrated
Length
304mm
0mm
Height
137mm
0mm
Slots
3
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
134.6
375.7+179%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 launched at $450. On MSRP, Radeon Pro Vega 48 was 24.9% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 25.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 79.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Radeon Pro Vega 48
MSRP
$599
$450-25%
Performance per Dollar
44.9+80%
25.0
Codename
AD104
Vega 10
Release
April 12 2023
March 19 2019
Ranking
#32
#241

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.