
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W6800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅5.3% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,200 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 598.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
Radeon Pro W6800X
2021Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌367.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,799 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($2,799 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Radeon Pro W6800X
2021Why buy it
- ✅5.3% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,200 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 598.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌367.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,799 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($2,799 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon Pro W6800X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro W6800X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 83 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 510 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 427 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 85 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 810 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 648 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 540 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 608 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 202 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 663 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 552 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 466 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 202 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon Pro W6800X

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon Pro W6800X
Radeon Pro W6800X
The Radeon Pro W6800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2087 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,000 points. Launch price was $2,799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon Pro W6800X's 18,000 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 49.5%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro W6800X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3,840 (Radeon Pro W6800X). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 16.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W6800X). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2087 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 60 (Radeon Pro W6800X) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+50% | 18,000 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+53% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+82% | 16.03 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+19% | 2087 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 184 | 240+30% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+673% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+800% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 60+30% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro W6800X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W6800X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W6800X has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro W6800X offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon Pro W6800X) — a 14.3% advantage for the Radeon Pro W6800X. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W6800X) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 32 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 576 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+800% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro W6800X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro W6800X). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro W6800X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro W6800X's 200W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Pro W6800X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W6800X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 267mm |
| Height | 137mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 3-25% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+50% | 90.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W6800X launched at $2799. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 78.6% less ($2200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 6.4 (Radeon Pro W6800X) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 601.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-79% | $2799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+602% | 6.4 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 21 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #32 | #158 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












