
GeForce RTX 4070

Radeon PRO W7500
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon PRO W7500 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon PRO W7500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon PRO W7500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅57.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 45% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.
- ❌40.7% longer card at 304mm vs 216mm.
Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 216mm instead of 304mm, a 88mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon PRO W7500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon PRO W7500
The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 13,298 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 102.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7500 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1700 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W7500) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+102% | 13,298 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+229% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+139% | 12.19 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+46% | 1700 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+64% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+1060% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1700% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+64% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W7500 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7500 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7500 carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W7500. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1700% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 70W — a 96.3% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 216mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 70W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 216mm |
| Height | 137mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 3 | 1-67% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6 | 190.0+41% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W7500 was 28.4% cheaper ($170 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 44.8% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $429-28% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+45% | 31.0 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 33 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | August 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #32 | #192 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














