GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon PRO W7500

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

2023Core: 1920 MHzBoost: 2475 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon PRO W7500

2023Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 1700 MHz

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon PRO W7500 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon PRO W7500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon PRO W7500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

  • 57.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 45% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.
  • 40.7% longer card at 304mm vs 216mm.

Radeon PRO W7500

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $170 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.
  • Measures 216mm instead of 304mm, a 88mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 57.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 102.4% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 13,298), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM, native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon PRO W7500 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 6nm, and 46 vs 28 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $170 more expensive on MSRP at $599 vs $429, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 45% (44.9 vs 31.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon PRO W7500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon PRO W7500

The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 13,298 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 102.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7500 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1700 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W7500) with 184 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Radeon PRO W7500
G3D Mark Score
26,919+102%
13,298
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
5 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
5888+229%
1792
Compute (TFLOPS)
29.15 TFLOPS+139%
12.19 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2475 MHz+46%
1700 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
184+64%
112
L1 Cache
5.8 MB+1060%
0.5 MB
L2 Cache
36 MB+1700%
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
46+64%
28

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W7500 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7500 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Radeon PRO W7500
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7500 carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W7500. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Radeon PRO W7500
VRAM Capacity
12 GB+50%
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6X
GDDR6
Bus Width
192-bit
256-bit+33%
L2 Cache
36 MB+1700%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Radeon PRO W7500
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Radeon PRO W7500
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC (2x)
VCN 4.0
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
VCN 4.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 70W — a 96.3% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 216mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Radeon PRO W7500
TDP
200W
70W-65%
Recommended PSU
650W
500W-23%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
304mm
216mm
Height
137mm
115mm
Slots
3
1-67%
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
134.6
190.0+41%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W7500 was 28.4% cheaper ($170 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 44.8% better value.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Radeon PRO W7500
MSRP
$599
$429-28%
Performance per Dollar
44.9+45%
31.0
Codename
AD104
Navi 33
Release
April 12 2023
August 3 2023
Ranking
#32
#192

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.