GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon R5 435

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

2023Core: 1920 MHzBoost: 2475 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 435

2016Core: 780 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon R5 435 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon R5 435 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon R5 435: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

  • 2331.6% more average FPS across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 371.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 9.5 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.
  • 81% longer card at 304mm vs 168mm.

Radeon R5 435

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $519 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.
  • Measures 168mm instead of 304mm, a 136mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.5 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2331.6% in average FPS across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3432.7% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 762), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon R5 435 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $519 more expensive on MSRP at $599 vs $80, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 371.8% (44.9 vs 9.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon R5 435 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon R5 435

The Radeon R5 435 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 762 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon R5 435's 762 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 3432.7%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R5 435 uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 320 (Radeon R5 435). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 435). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1030 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Radeon R5 435
G3D Mark Score
26,919+3433%
762
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GCN 1.0
Process Node
5 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
5888+1740%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
29.15 TFLOPS+4322%
0.6592 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2475 MHz+140%
1030 MHz
ROPs
64+700%
8
TMUs
184+820%
20
L1 Cache
5.8 MB+7150%
0.08 MB
L2 Cache
36 MB+27592%
0.13 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon R5 435 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 435 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Radeon R5 435
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 435 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 435. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon R5 435) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Radeon R5 435
VRAM Capacity
12 GB+2300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6X
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
504 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
192-bit+50%
128-bit
L2 Cache
36 MB+27592%
0.13 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R5 435). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Radeon R5 435
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 (FL 11_1)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 435). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R5 435).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Radeon R5 435
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC (2x)
VCE 1.0
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
UVD 3.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon R5 435's 30W — a 147.8% difference. The Radeon R5 435 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Radeon R5 435). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 168mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Radeon R5 435
TDP
200W
30W-85%
Recommended PSU
650W
350W-46%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
304mm
168mm
Height
137mm
69mm
Slots
3
1-67%
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
134.6+430%
25.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the Radeon R5 435 launched at $80. On MSRP, Radeon R5 435 was 86.6% cheaper ($519 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 9.5 (Radeon R5 435) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 372.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Radeon R5 435
MSRP
$599
$80-87%
Performance per Dollar
44.9+373%
9.5
Codename
AD104
Jet
Release
April 12 2023
May 15 2016
Ranking
#32
#922

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.