G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅1788.8% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 280.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
❌81% longer card at 304mm vs 168mm.

Radeon R7 250

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $510 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 304mm, a 136mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Radeon R7 250

2013

Why buy it

✅1788.8% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 280.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $510 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 304mm, a 136mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
❌81% longer card at 304mm vs 168mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon R7 250?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4070 averages 1788.8% more FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 1,051 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon R7 250 is a 2013 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2013, 2461.3% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 2 GB, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 4070 is about 573.0% more expensive on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $89 MSRP, and you are getting 1788.8% more estimated average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2461.3% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R7 250 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon R7 250 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R7 250 is 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 1,051 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

Radeon R7 250 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon R7 250
1080p
low	183 FPS	13 FPS
medium	167 FPS	8 FPS
high	151 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	3 FPS
1440p
low	150 FPS	7 FPS
medium	124 FPS	4 FPS
high	110 FPS	2 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	1 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	3 FPS
medium	78 FPS	2 FPS
high	65 FPS	1 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	1 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon R7 250

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon R7 250
1080p
low	544 FPS	47 FPS
medium	454 FPS	27 FPS
high	353 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	299 FPS	13 FPS
1440p
low	351 FPS	15 FPS
medium	288 FPS	9 FPS
high	235 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	172 FPS	5 FPS
medium	144 FPS	3 FPS
high	125 FPS	2 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	2 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon R7 250

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon R7 250
1080p
low	884 FPS	47 FPS
medium	713 FPS	38 FPS
high	643 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	24 FPS
1440p
low	684 FPS	35 FPS
medium	549 FPS	28 FPS
high	483 FPS	24 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	18 FPS
4K
low	467 FPS	24 FPS
medium	373 FPS	19 FPS
high	326 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	12 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon R7 250

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon R7 250
1080p
low	751 FPS	47 FPS
medium	612 FPS	38 FPS
high	536 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	497 FPS	24 FPS
1440p
low	615 FPS	35 FPS
medium	500 FPS	28 FPS
high	433 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	395 FPS	14 FPS
4K
low	384 FPS	21 FPS
medium	324 FPS	14 FPS
high	301 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	7 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon R7 250

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon R7 250

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon R7 250

The Radeon R7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,051 points. Launch price was $89.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon R7 250's 1,051 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 2461.3%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R7 250 uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 384 (Radeon R7 250). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon R7 250
G3D Mark Score	26,919+2461%	1,051
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 1.0
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	5888+1433%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+3515%	0.8064 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+136%	1050 MHz
ROPs	64+700%	8
TMUs	184+667%	24
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+6344%	0.09 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+14300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R7 250 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R7 250 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon R7 250
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 250 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 250) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon R7 250
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+500%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	36 MB+14300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 11.1 (Radeon R7 250). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon R7 250
DirectX	12.2+10%	11.1
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 250). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 250).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon R7 250
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	VCE 1.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	UVD 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon R7 250's 65W — a 101.9% difference. The Radeon R7 250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 300W (Radeon R7 250). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 304mm vs 168mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon R7 250
TDP	200W	65W-68%
Recommended PSU	650W	300W-54%
Power Connector	8-pin	None
Length	304mm	168mm
Height	137mm	111mm
Slots	3	1-67%
Temp (Load)	80°C	75-6%
Perf/Watt	134.6+731%	16.2

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon R7 250 launched at $89. The Radeon R7 250 costs 85.1% less ($510 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 11.8 (Radeon R7 250) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 280.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).