GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon R9 M265X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon R9 M265X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon R9 M265X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅1445.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 670.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M265X

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $399 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1445.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2206.7% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 1,167), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon R9 M265X has no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $399 more expensive on MSRP at $599 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 670.2% (44.9 vs 5.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon R9 M265X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon R9 M265X

The Radeon R9 M265X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 21 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,167 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon R9 M265X's 1,167 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 2206.7%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R9 M265X uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M265X). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M265X). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 625 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon R9 M265X
G3D Mark Score	26,919+2207%	1,167
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 1.0
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	5888+820%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+3544%	0.8 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+296%	625 MHz
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	184+360%	40
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+3525%	0.16 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+14300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon R9 M265X does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M265X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon R9 M265X
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M265X carries 4 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M265X. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M265X) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon R9 M265X
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	36 MB+14300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 M265X's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The Radeon R9 M265X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M265X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon R9 M265X
TDP	200W	75W-63%
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	Mobile
Length	304mm	—
Height	137mm	—
Slots	3	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	134.6+763%	15.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the Radeon R9 M265X launched at $200. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M265X was 66.6% cheaper ($399 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 5.8 (Radeon R9 M265X) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 674.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon R9 M265X
MSRP	$599	$200-67%
Performance per Dollar	44.9+674%	5.8
Codename	AD104	Venus
Release	April 12 2023	March 21 2014
Ranking	#32	#839

Search GeForce RTX 4070 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M265X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.