
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M395X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+425.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 426.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 8.5 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
Radeon R9 M395X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,120 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌0.2% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Radeon R9 M395X
2015Why buy it
- ✅+425.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 426.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 8.5 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,120 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌0.2% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon R9 M395X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 M395X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 58 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon R9 M395X

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon R9 M395X
Radeon R9 M395X
The Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,120 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon R9 M395X's 5,120 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 425.8%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R9 M395X uses GCN 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M395X). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M395X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+426% | 5,120 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+188% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+884% | 2.961 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 184+44% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+1060% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+7100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 M395X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M395X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M395X has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 160 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395X) — a 215% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M395X) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+215% | 160 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+7100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 M395X's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The Radeon R9 M395X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 75W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 304mm | — |
| Height | 137mm | — |
| Slots | 3 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+97% | 68.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M395X launched at $600. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 0.2% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8.5 (Radeon R9 M395X) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 428.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+428% | 8.5 |
| Codename | AD104 | Amethyst |
| Release | April 12 2023 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #32 | #438 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












