
GeForce RTX 4070

Radeon RX 470/570
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon RX 470/570 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon RX 470/570 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon RX 470/570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅131.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.
- ❌26.7% longer card at 304mm vs 240mm.
Radeon RX 470/570
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $420 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 304mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon RX 470/570 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 470/570
The Radeon RX 470/570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 926 MHz to 1206 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,935 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon RX 470/570's 7,935 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 239.2%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 470/570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 470/570). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4.94 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 470/570). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1206 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+239% | 7,935 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+188% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+490% | 4.94 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+105% | 1206 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 184+44% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+1060% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1700% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon RX 470/570 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 470/570 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 470/570 carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 470/570) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 470/570. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 470/570) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+125% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1700% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 470/570). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 470/570). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 470/570).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 470/570's 120W — a 50% difference. The Radeon RX 470/570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 450W (Radeon RX 470/570). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 240mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 120W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 450W-31% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin |
| Length | 304mm | 240mm |
| Height | 137mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+104% | 66.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the Radeon RX 470/570 launched at $179. On MSRP, Radeon RX 470/570 was 70.1% cheaper ($420 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 44.3 (Radeon RX 470/570) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 1.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $179-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+1% | 44.3 |
| Codename | AD104 | Ellesmere |
| Release | April 12 2023 | August 4 2016 |
| Ranking | #32 | #315 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














