
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+352.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌135.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 85W.
Radeon RX 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 200W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,954 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Radeon RX 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅+352.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 200W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌135.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 85W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,954 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon RX 5500M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 5500M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 67 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon RX 5500M

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M
The Radeon RX 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1375 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,954 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon RX 5500M's 5,954 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 352.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500M). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500M). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+352% | 5,954 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+318% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+529% | 4.632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+50% | 1645 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 184+109% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1700% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4070 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 5500M relies on FSR Frame Generation. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5500M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5500M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500M) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 5500M) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+125% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1700% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5500M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 5500M's 85W — a 80.7% difference. The Radeon RX 5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5500M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 85W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 0mm |
| Height | 137mm | — |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+92% | 70.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 14 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #32 | #400 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












