
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 560X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+706% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 73.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 25.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
Radeon RX 560X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,340 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 25.9 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Radeon RX 560X
2018Why buy it
- ✅+706% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 73.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 25.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,340 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 25.9 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon RX 560X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 560X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 6 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 38 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon RX 560X

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 560X
Radeon RX 560X
The Radeon RX 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,340 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon RX 560X's 3,340 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 706%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 560X uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1275 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+706% | 3,340 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+475% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+1016% | 2.611 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+94% | 1275 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 184+188% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+2220% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+3500% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4070 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 560X relies on FSR Frame Generation. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 560X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560X has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560X) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+3500% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 560X's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The Radeon RX 560X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 400W (Radeon RX 560X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 75W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 400W-38% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 304mm | — |
| Height | 137mm | — |
| Slots | 3 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+202% | 44.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 560X launched at $129. The Radeon RX 560X costs 78.5% less ($470 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 25.9 (Radeon RX 560X) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 73.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $129-78% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+73% | 25.9 |
| Codename | AD104 | Polaris 21 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | April 11 2018 |
| Ranking | #32 | #556 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












