
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+286.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.
- ❌26.1% longer card at 304mm vs 241mm.
Radeon RX 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $430 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 304mm, a 63mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,967 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Radeon RX 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅+286.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $430 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 304mm, a 63mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.
- ❌26.1% longer card at 304mm vs 241mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,967 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon RX 570?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 570 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 16 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 78 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon RX 570

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 570
Radeon RX 570
The Radeon RX 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1168 MHz to 1244 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,967 points. Launch price was $169.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon RX 570's 6,967 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 286.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 570). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 5.095 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 570). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1244 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+286% | 6,967 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+188% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+472% | 5.095 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+99% | 1244 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 184+44% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+1060% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1700% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4070 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 570 relies on FSR Frame Generation. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 570 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 570 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 570) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 570) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+125% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1700% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (Radeon RX 570). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 5+25% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 570). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.265,H.264 (Radeon RX 570).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 570's 120W — a 50% difference. The Radeon RX 570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 450W (Radeon RX 570). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 241mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 120W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 450W-31% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 304mm | 241mm |
| Height | 137mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+132% | 58.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 570 launched at $169. The Radeon RX 570 costs 71.8% less ($430 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 41.2 (Radeon RX 570) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $169-72% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+9% | 41.2 |
| Codename | AD104 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #32 | #356 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












